AI Artificial Intelligence Clones Robots Futuristic

The Rise of AI Avatars: Can They Replace Real Individuals?

Now this has nothing to do with handbags, but that's okay. This section, is for those who still enjoy a good read, of all things worldly. Inspired to engage in healthy cognitive habits. 


The Rise of AI Avatars: Can They Replace Real Individuals?

In a world where AI-generated content blurs the lines between reality and fabrication, Joanna Stern, an intrepid journalist, embarked on a captivating experiment. Determined to investigate the capabilities of AI avatars, Joanna delved into various scenarios to ascertain if these virtual replicas could truly substitute real individuals. Join us as we delve into her insightful exploration, shedding light on the possibilities and limitations of AI avatars.


Challenge One. Phone Calls:

Joanna's first test involved using her AI avatar to make phone calls. She initiated a conversation with Evan Spiegel, CEO of Snap, discussing the potential effects of excessive AI interaction on human relationships. Although Evan detected slight clues in the voice, he initially believed Joanna was real. Joanna also called her sister, who was momentarily deceived by the AI replication but soon realized the absence of natural conversational pauses, exposing the limitations of the avatar's speech pattern.


Challenge Two: Creating a TikTok: The Quest for Authenticity

To test the AI avatar's ability to create content, Joanna enlisted the assistance of ChatGPT, an AI language model. She aimed to produce a TikTok script in her own voice. However, it proved challenging to generate authentic content, as the AI occasionally provided inaccurate or fabricated information. After multiple attempts, Joanna finally obtained a suitable script and merged it with her AI avatar using Synthesia. The resulting TikTok video impressed Joanna, but keen-eyed TikTok users certainly noticed limitations in the avatar's movements and facial expressions, highlighting the challenges of achieving seamless replication.


Challenge Three: Bank Biometrics: A Voice for Verification

Intrigued by the voice recognition systems used by some banks, Joanna decided to test their efficacy. She successfully gained access to her Chase bank account by verifying her identity using her AI avatar's voice. This process bypassed additional security measures typically reliant on security questions. However, when an intern attempted to mimic Joanna's voice for verification, the system detected the impersonation and requested further authentication. Chase emphasized that they utilize multiple layers of verification, indicating that voice recognition alone is not the sole authentication factor. That's nice to know.


Challenge Four: Video Calls: The Illusion Falters

Joanna explored the potential of her AI avatar in video calls, utilizing pre-generated videos of her avatar saying generic meeting phrases. While the AI-generated voice convinced participants, the lack of realistic body movements and limited facial expressions raised suspicions. Observant participants noticed the absence of humor and the unnatural posture of the avatar, exposing the limitations of current video cloning technology.


Conclusion: Balancing Potential and Concerns

Joanna's venture into the realm of AI avatars shed light on their current capabilities and inherent limitations. While AI-generated voices exhibited convincing qualities, video clones still fell short of seamlessly replicating real individuals. The experiment also raised concerns about potential misuse of such technology, emphasizing the need for vigilance in distinguishing between genuine individuals and AI replicas. Striking a balance between time-saving convenience and safeguarding against malicious use is crucial as AI avatar development progresses. As technology advances, continued exploration and ethical considerations will shape the future of AI avatars in society.

My thoughts below (Author): As AI technology advances, integrating it into phone calls presents both opportunities and challenges. As AI voice technology becomes more sophisticated, it becomes increasingly difficult to distinguish between a real human and an AI-generated voice. This can lead to skepticism and uncertainty about the credibility of the information conveyed during phone conversations.

Privacy and Data Security: AI-powered phone systems often rely on collecting and processing large amounts of personal data. This data may include voice recordings, call transcripts, and other sensitive information. Safeguarding this data against unauthorized access, hacking, or misuse becomes crucial to protect individuals' privacy and maintain data security.

Lack of Emotional Understanding: AI voice assistants may struggle to understand and respond appropriately to complex emotions or nuanced cues during conversations. Human communication involves non-verbal cues, tone, and context, which can be challenging for AI systems to accurately interpret and respond to. This can lead to miscommunications or misinterpretations, affecting the quality of the conversation.

Bias and Discrimination: AI systems are trained on large datasets, which may inadvertently contain biases present in the data. This can lead to biased responses or discriminatory behavior during interactions, particularly in sensitive or high-stakes situations. Ensuring fairness and addressing biases in AI systems is crucial to maintain equitable and unbiased dialogue.

Overtime they will be trained to be better, but lets not forget the lines between real and artificial, our species may depend on it.

This constructed article is a partial summary and reinterpretation of a live analysis conducted by the Journalist Joanne Stern who challenged her AI clone to replace her for 24 hours - Wall Street Journal News.

Author: -Dochè Lanoi-

Click here to read more of my articles.

Back to blog

Leave a comment